|
Anonymous |
|
Good Job
|
0 |
Sep 15 2009, 9:44 PM EDT by
Anonymous |
|
|
Thread started: Sep 15 2009, 9:44 PM EDT
Watch
Thanks for helping me understand
2
out of
4 found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
Do you?
|
|
Anonymous |
|
hiiiiii
|
0 |
Jul 19 2009, 7:06 PM EDT by
Anonymous |
|
|
Thread started: Jul 19 2009, 7:06 PM EDT
Watch
hey i appreciate with the way you explain the matrics...really gud job
1
out of
1 found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
Do you?
|
|
|
|
Great job!
|
0 |
Jun 10 2007, 1:45 PM EDT by
|
|
|
Thread started: Jun 10 2007, 1:45 PM EDT
Watch
Your explainations are amazing!
The flow chart is very clear and easy to understand. I also loved how you labelled the matrices diagram to explain exactly what they are. Really great work!
4
out of
4 found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
Do you?
|
|
|
|
wonderful=)
|
0 |
Jun 6 2007, 5:05 PM EDT by
|
|
|
Thread started: Jun 6 2007, 5:05 PM EDT
Watch
we think that you guys have done a wonderful job on presenting the lesson, and it is very explanatory. We learnt a lot from this wiki, but at the same time we think that you could improve on clarifying your examples by labelling them more distinctively. Over all it was very appealling, especially with the colors
3
out of
3 found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
Do you?
|
|
|
|
nice job!
|
1 |
Apr 26 2007, 3:15 PM EDT by
Anonymous |
|
|
Thread started: Oct 29 2006, 2:13 PM EST
Watch
Hi Johnathon,
really nice job! It's a very clean look!
1
out of
4 found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
Do you?
Show Last Reply
|
|
Last Reply:
RE: nice job!
By: Posted Anonymously,
Apr 26 2007, 3:15 PM EDT
Jonathan Gafar sure knows his stuff!
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
|
|
|
hwk
|
0 |
Mar 29 2007, 7:52 PM EDT by
|
|
|
Thread started: Mar 29 2007, 7:52 PM EDT
Watch
sir i was doing the review hwk you gave us and i am stuck on # 11...i am not sure how to setup the matrices..please help me if you can. thank you
1
out of
1 found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
Do you?
|
|
|
|
Suggestions
|
0 |
Mar 27 2007, 11:47 PM EDT by
|
|
|
Thread started: Mar 27 2007, 11:47 PM EDT
Watch
1. A title should be added to the flowchart so it is easy to know what the flowchart is about.
2. The arrows are also mising on the flowchart after "If K=0".
Everything else is very well done.
1
out of
1 found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
Do you?
|
|
andrewkaldas |
|
Overall Good Work!!
|
0 |
Jan 9 2007, 6:14 PM EST by
andrewkaldas |
|
|
Thread started: Jan 9 2007, 6:14 PM EST
Watch
this an overall good piece of work...i like it and i find it extremely useful...it might be longer than any other page but i understand that you are covering two lessons....i like the fact that you have put many examples enough to show your idea and explain the lesson...the way you coloured the examples helped to show the right consequence of steps for dealing with matrices...it's really good! =)
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
|
|
really good
|
0 |
Nov 14 2006, 5:53 PM EST by
|
|
|
Thread started: Nov 14 2006, 5:53 PM EST
Watch
the page looks really good and the examples look detailed...did u also cover the 1.7 chapter? keep up the good work =)
0
out of
2 found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
Do you?
|
|
|
|
tags?
|
0 |
Nov 7 2006, 7:56 PM EST by
|
|
|
Thread started: Nov 7 2006, 7:56 PM EST
Watch
????
0
out of
2 found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
Do you?
|
|
gaith-saad |
|
1.6 and 1.7
|
0 |
Oct 31 2006, 8:39 PM EST by
gaith-saad |
|
|
Thread started: Oct 31 2006, 8:39 PM EST
Watch
Yes o ur topic covered 1.6 and 1.7
0
out of
2 found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
Do you?
|
|
|
|
what is your topic???
|
0 |
Oct 30 2006, 9:36 PM EST by
|
|
|
Thread started: Oct 30 2006, 9:36 PM EST
Watch
I was just wondering if you have 1.6 and 1.7 both as your topics because you have covered a lot of portion from 1.7....any ays nice work!!!
0
out of
2 found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
Do you?
|
|
|
|
logo
|
0 |
Oct 28 2006, 10:16 AM EDT by
|
|
|
Thread started: Oct 28 2006, 10:16 AM EDT
Watch
Hi Jakub,
it looks good!
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
|
|
Minor Mistake
|
0 |
Oct 27 2006, 4:21 PM EDT by
|
|
|
Thread started: Oct 27 2006, 4:21 PM EDT
Watch
Youu forgot to give a heading to the flowchart and the arrows are missing which joins witht the next box or action that took place.
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
|
|
Comment on the comments
|
0 |
Oct 27 2006, 2:35 PM EDT by
|
|
|
Thread started: Oct 27 2006, 2:35 PM EDT
Watch
Hi to all,
first of all, while there may be some room for modifications, I think this post is a good one. I can see the effort put into it. The diagrams, for example, are very helpful.
When any of you are commenting, please make your comments as specific as possible. The comment below this one, for example, is unclear to me. It refers to an answer, but I cannot tell what it is about the answer that is being commented on. So I will not count Sarthak's comment.
Please try to be specific. The wiki is meant to develop your thinking AND your writing skills.
Have a great weekend!
1
out of
1 found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
Do you?
|
|
|
|
pretty good
|
0 |
Oct 27 2006, 2:37 AM EDT by
|
|
|
Thread started: Oct 27 2006, 2:37 AM EDT
Watch
1. In your examples of multiplication, there is one thing missing. You have explained that the inner dimensions need to be the same to multiply and that's right but what about the answer. You have written that in the answer, but you need the explanation. Ex 1 c2,2,.? why is the answer c2,2.?
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
AnitaW |
|
Comment and suggestions
|
0 |
Oct 25 2006, 10:54 PM EDT by
AnitaW |
|
|
Thread started: Oct 25 2006, 10:54 PM EDT
Watch
1. Grammar needs editing
2. For dimensions of the matrix, you should elaborate on how it's written. Your example should include 2 x 2 somewhere.
3. Multiplication and Division --> The example questions are crammed together (very confusing).
For your multiplication example, you should use two matrices with different dimensions. Your example 1, both matrix A and B have the same dimensions (2 x 2)...
for example, matrix A times matrix B...
What if my matrix A has a dimension of 2 x 3... and matrix B has a dimension of 3 x 5? What's the dimension of my final matrix? You can elaborate on that in your entry...
4. Inverse of a matrix --- you should explain this some more...and why can't ad=/=bc? (because it would be zero, and when you divide anything by zero, its undefined)
In your flow chart:"IF K = 0" is not a question.
5. The diagrams are really helpful, especially the addition and subtraction.
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
|
|
feedback
|
0 |
Oct 25 2006, 7:17 PM EDT by
|
|
|
Thread started: Oct 25 2006, 7:17 PM EDT
Watch
its a minor mistake, but in your second image (diagram) you spelt Matrix, Metrix.
The identity matrix is somewhat confusing. Having the three dots underneath a2,2 makes me feel that i should continue writing ones down the column, instead of writing zeroes below that element. Perhaps make a different diagram with more clarity.
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
|
|
feedback
|
0 |
Oct 25 2006, 9:19 AM EDT by
|
|
|
Thread started: Oct 25 2006, 9:19 AM EDT
Watch
I would suggest using headers and subheaders to make everything look clearer and easier to read. Also I would suggest to check the grammer under the section where there are row, column and special matrices
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
|
|
Yes
|
0 |
Oct 24 2006, 3:44 PM EDT by
|
|
|
Thread started: Oct 24 2006, 3:44 PM EDT
Watch
i was using the wrong user name.
thank you Mr._D'Onofrio
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
